Subquestion

In what ways are women farmers collaborating with local organizations, governments, or international programs to build resilience against climate impacts?

Short answer

Key finding

Women leverage local and institutional support through loans, training, and social networks to combat climate change challenges

Short summary 

Women farmers are using a combination of loans, training, and social networks to tackle climate change. In Bangladesh, rural women access financial loans from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to mitigate the impacts of floods. In northeastern Nigeria, government schemes provide agricultural loans, pesticides, and tools to women-headed households, enabling them to adapt to drought conditions. In Vietnam, organisations offer low-interest loans to women in coastal and central regions, helping them start businesses and adapt to decreasing rice productivity. Additionally, training programs provided by NGOs equip women in countries like India and Bangladesh with skills to diversify their income sources, innovate, and adjust farming practices. In Sudan, women benefit from social networks facilitated by community organizations to learn Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK). Despite cultural restrictions, these organizations play a pivotal role in building resilience and empowering women to tackle climate change.

Long answer

Long summary

What is this summary about?

This summary highlights how women farmers work with various organisations and institutions for loans, training, and networks to build resilience against climate change.

What evidence is this summary based on?

This summary is based on two systematic reviews:

Haque, A. T. M. S., Kumar, L., & Bhullar, N. (2023). Gendered perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation practices: a systematic review. Climate and Development, 15(10), 885–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2176185

Nahar, K., & Tajuddin, N. A. B. (2022). A systematic review on women’s disaster adaptation strategies in changing climate. Saudi Journal of Humanities Social Sciences, 7(6), 257-269. https://www.academia.edu/download/87020672/234696369.pdf

What are the main findings?

Women are leveraging both local and institutional support—through loans, training, and social networks—to develop strategies that help them combat the growing challenges posed by climate change. Haque (2023) and Nahar (2022) show that women often partner with NGOs for microcredit, livelihood training, and disaster preparedness. Additionally, the two studies highlight that women draw on indigenous knowledge, intergenerational learning, and community networks to enhance adaptation strategies collectively. 

In Bangladesh, for instance, women in rural areas prioritize seeking financial or credit loans from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to support their families and mitigate the adverse effects of climate change, such as floods. Similarly, in drought-prone regions of northeastern Nigeria, women-headed households access government schemes offering agricultural loans, pesticides, and tools, which enable them to make informed choices about adapting to climate conditions.

In Vietnam, women in both coastal and central regions have taken loans at lower interest rates, allowing them to adapt to decreasing rice productivity by starting new businesses or supporting existing livelihoods. In addition to financial support, women in many regions are also receiving training to diversify their income sources, gain farming knowledge, and innovate in their agricultural practices. This training is critical, especially for women who may not have access to formal education, and it allows them to build skills that help them adapt to climate impacts.

Moreover, in countries like India and Bangladesh, women in drought-prone and flood-affected areas are receiving training from various organizations to enhance their resilience. This includes adapting farming techniques, developing alternative livelihoods, and even using education as a preventive measure. In Sudan, women have also turned to social networks, learning Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) to help them adapt to local climate conditions. However, many gendered cultural practices limit women’s access to formal social networks and can restrict their ability to connect with these support systems.

The evidence is based on two reviews, one with a moderate confidence rating and the other with low confidence rating, as assessed using the AMSTAR tool for systematic reviews.

Review summaries

Review summary 1

Gendered perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation practices: a systematic review

Review

Gendered perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation practices: a systematic review

Authors

A. T. M. Sanaul Haque, Lalit Kumar, and Navjot Bhullar

Geography

Ghana (7), India (5), Tanzania (5), Bangladesh (4), Kenya (4), China (4), Uganda (3), Nigeria (3), Malawi (2), Ethiopia (1), Mali (1), Nepal (1), Benin (1), Eritrea (1), Mexico (1), Philippines (1), Sudan (1).

Year

2023

Citation

Haque, A. T. M. S., Kumar, L., & Bhullar, N. (2023). Gendered perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation practices: a systematic review. Climate and Development, 15(10), 885–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2176185

Number of included studies

41

Review type

Systemative review (Qualitative synthesis)

Critical appraisal of included studies

No

Assessment review

1. Key finding

 

Overall
Perceptions of climate change, adaptation strategies, access to resources, and social networks for effective adaptation are distinctly shaped by gender, with men and women exhibiting differentiated roles, resources, and support systems that influence their adaptive capacities and responses to climate impacts. 

 

Women and girls-related
Gender roles significantly shape adaptation strategies in agriculture, with men typically engaging in labor-intensive and resource-focused activities, while women prioritize less labor-demanding tasks and household food security, reflecting distinct responsibilities in response to climate challenges. Women face restricted access to productive resources, limiting their adoption of technical climate adaptation strategies and often confining them to managerial roles, while men tend to dominate resource-intensive activities due to cultural norms and differential resource ownership. Women face restricted access to productive resources, limiting their adoption of technical climate adaptation strategies and often confining them to managerial roles, while men tend to dominate resource-intensive activities due to cultural norms and differential resource ownership.

 

2. Short summary

 

Research reveals mixed evidence regarding gendered perceptions of climate change. While men and women share similar views, women often report greater concern, especially over specific threats like crop losses and saltwater intrusion. This heightened concern may stem from a more fatalistic outlook on climate, possibly due to limited access to information. Gender roles critically shape these perceptions; for example, women in Uganda focus on issues impacting fuel and water due to their domestic roles, while men emphasize soil fertility and livestock health.

 

Adaptation strategies also differ by gender. Women, restricted by unequal access to resources, tend to adopt managerial adaptations like crop rotation, while men typically engage in structural changes like flood prevention. Financial and technical adaptations vary; women in Bangladesh rely on savings or loans for small businesses, while men in Ghana often sell assets. The findings emphasize that women often face adaptation barriers due to poverty and limited capital. Gender roles and associated socioeconomic factors distinctly shape climate resilience. Women often rely more on localized, food security-focused social networks, while men access broader, crop-oriented institutional networks, with cultural practices further restricting women’s social connectivity and network access.

 

3. Long summary

 

3.1 PICOS 

Population: Women

Concept: gender disaggregated perception and/or adaptation to cli-mate change in agriculture

Context: No specific region

 

3.2 Risk of bias - Not assessed

 

3.3 Publication bias - Not assessed

 

3.4 Findings

Evidence on gendered perceptions of climate change is mixed. Some studies suggest men and women share similar views, while others indicate women show slightly higher concern and greater sensitivity to temperature changes. Many studies note that women, often with limited climate information, are more fatalistic about climate change, sometimes viewing it as divine will. In China, women attribute climate change to human actions, whereas in Ghana, Malawi, and Bangladesh, both genders frequently cite deforestation and overpopulation. Female farmers generally express greater concerns over crop losses, reduced productivity, and environmental threats, while men more frequently report flood occurrences, with women focusing on flood impacts and prevention.

 

Gender roles significantly shape perceptions of climate change, leading men and women to experience and interpret impacts differently. For example, in India, men typically observe effects on activities they manage, like hunting and livestock health, while women are more attuned to changes affecting forest food plants, medicinal plants, and horticulture due to their responsibilities in these areas. In Ghana, women perceive reductions in food production more than men because of their role in securing food supplies. Similarly, in Uganda, women note prolonged droughts, saline water, and wetland changes for fuel cultivation, while men focus on soil fertility decline. These differences suggest that specific gender roles within communities lead to distinct climate change perceptions, even among people living in the same area. Climate change perception among farmers also varies by age, social status, and ethnicity, influencing adaptation behaviors. Older and poorer farmers in India and Mexico are more certain about climate impacts, while concerns about climate change strongly drive adaptation efforts, especially among women.

 

Some of the climate change adaptation strategies adopted and variation by gender:

 

Technical adaptation The adoption of improved crop varieties and livestock breeds varies by gender and location, with women favoring fast-maturing crops and men often prioritizing drought-resistant varieties. Gendered differences also affect adoption rates, with women in Bangladesh adopting diverse agriculture more than men, whereas men in Ghana lead in diversification efforts.

 

Financial adaptation: In response to climate change, men in Ghana and Kenya typically sell assets like livestock to cope with drought, while women rely more on borrowing or savings. Asset sale strategies also vary by climate impact and gender, with male-headed households selling assets during drought and female-headed households amid pest infestations. Women in Bangladesh and Malawi frequently join savings schemes and take loans for small businesses, whereas in India, more men take loans, borrow from neighbors, and use savings for adaptation.

 

Structural Adaptation: Structural adaptation strategies typically fall to men, such as flood prevention and drainage, while women often adopt water harvesting, pen reinforcement, and fire control measures, sometimes increasing their labor, as seen in Sudan.

 

Managerial Adaptation: Farmers, regardless of gender, widely adopt managerial adaptation strategies, with variations by gender; women in Tanzania focus on cropping and fertilization, men on conservation and feed improvement, and in Ghana, men prioritize fish farming, while women emphasize seasonal forecasting and post-harvest tech.

 

Socio-cultural adaptation: Key socio-cultural adaptation strategies include changes in food habits, gender roles, farming systems, and education. In Ghana and Eritrea, women reduced meal size and used wild plants during drought, while in Mali, women took on livestock rearing as men shifted to migration or sharecropping due to climate challenges.

 

Livelihood Adaptation: Farmers adapt to climate change by diversifying income through non-farm activities, with gender differences in preferred strategies. In Malawi, men leaned towards fisheries and agriculture-related activities, while women engaged more in petty businesses. Additionally, men in some regions pursued exclusive livelihoods like fishing or carpentry, while women focused on small-scale businesses, labor, and forest-based livelihoods.

 

Migration as adaptation: Migration as an adaptation strategy to climate change is primarily undertaken by men, though women also migrate for non-farm work, with some regions seeing higher female migration. Seasonal migration patterns vary, with men shifting pastures during droughts and women adopting circular migration for fishing. Migration can lead to positive outcomes, such as female empowerment through remittances, but also negatively impacts women left behind, increasing their workload and leading to female-headed households in certain regions.

 

3.5 Sensitivity analysis - Not assessed

 

4. AMSTAR 2 assessment of the review

 

1 Did the the review state clearly the components of PICOS (or appropriate equivalent)?  YES
2 Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol?  (i.e. was there a protocol) Partial Yes
3 Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? Partial Yes
4 Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate?  No
5 Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate?  No
6 Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions?  No
7 Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail?  (Yes if table of included studies, partially if other descriptive overview) Yes
8 Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review?  No
9 Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? No
10 If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results?  NA
11 Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review?  NA
12 If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review?  NA
13 Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review?  Yes
Overall (lowest rating on any critical item) Moderate

 

5. Count of references to the following words 

 

Sex 3
Gender 205
Women 141
Intra-household 4

 

Included Studies

Review summary 2

A Systematic Review on Women’s Disaster Adaptation Strategies in Changing Climate

Review

A Systematic Review on Women’s Disaster Adaptation Strategies in Changing Climate

Authors

Kamrun Nahar and Nor Azlin Binti Tajuddin

Geography

Bangladesh (6), Vietnam (3), Nepal (3), India (2), Mali (1), Nigeria (1), Erub Island (1), and China (1).

Year

2022

Citation

Nahar, K., & Tajuddin, N. A. B. (2022). A systematic review on women’s disaster adaptation strategies in changing climate. Saudi Journal of Humanities Social Sciences, 7(6), 257-269.

Number of included studies

19

Review type

Systematic Review (Qualitative synthesis)

Critical appraisal of included studies

No

Assessment review

1. Key finding

 

Overall
Women in rural and agrarian communities adapt to climate change through diverse strategies such as livelihood diversification, altered crop practices, reliance on microcredit, migration, indigenous knowledge use, and income generation through trade and livestock rearing. However, systemic gender barriers limit their access to resources, impacting their resilience and adaptation effectiveness.

 

2. Short summary
Women in rural and agrarian communities employ diverse strategies to adapt to climate change impacts. In India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Mali, women turn to alternative livelihoods like making handicrafts, engaging in petty trade, livestock rearing, and forest-based activities when traditional agriculture becomes unsustainable due to environmental stressors. For instance, women in Bangladesh took up soil-cutting for income after Cyclone Aila, and Vietnamese women increasingly engage in waged labor due to water scarcity. In places where male migration shifts family roles, women assume greater adaptation responsibilities despite facing limited access to land, credit, and resources.

 

Women’s access to financial resources, often restricted, drives reliance on loans, microcredit, and savings to fund adaptation efforts, while education and training enhance adaptation abilities, especially where women receive support from NGOs. Local ecological knowledge is also critical; women in the Fijian Islands and Torres Strait use indigenous knowledge to manage food security and predict weather. Across regions, women reduce their own consumption to prioritize family needs in times of food scarcity, and they leverage diverse adaptation methods to support household resilience despite significant barriers posed by gender norms and financial limitations.

 

3. Long summary

 

3.1 PICOS 

PCC: Population/concept/context framework

Population - women, 

Concept - adaptation strategies in response to climate-related disasters 

Context - no specific zone

 

3.2 Risk of bias - Not assessed 

 

3.3 Publication bias - Not assessed

 

3.4 Findings 

The review identifies a number of adaptation strategies taken up by women in the context of climate change, especially in rural and agrarian settings. These include:

 

Income source diversification: In India’s Katper village, women make rope from cotton waste due to declining incomes from fishing and gardening caused by climate change. After Cyclone Aila in 2009, Bangladeshi women in Khulna turned to soil-cutting for income. In Vietnam and Mali, women shifted to livestock raising and firewood collection as water scarcity hampers farming, while worsening droughts in Mali have led women to adopt forest-based livelihoods. Male migration has also prompted women to pursue off-farm income.

 

Livelihood diversification: In Bangladesh, women diversify their livelihoods by cultivating varied crops, albeit with lower adoption rates than men due to societal barriers. Vietnamese women often shift to waged labor instead of agriculture. In Nepal, decreased crop production due to warming leads women to rely on day labor. In northeastern Nigeria, both men and women adopt off-farm activities to manage food security amid drought. In India, coastal flooding in Gujarat and annual storms push women to shift away from traditional livelihoods like fishing, while in Uttarakhand and Mali, they take up wage labor and forest-based livelihoods to adapt 

 

Altered cultivation/crop management/crop diversification: In agrarian societies, adaptation is vital, though gender norms limit women's roles in agricultural adaptation. While men control agricultural output, some societies allow or require limited female participation. Female-headed households employ adaptive strategies, like flood-resistant rice in India, drought-resistant crops in Nepal, and charcoal production in Mali. Nigerian women adopt intercropping and crop rotation at lower rates than men, while Bangladeshi women use salt-tolerant and mangrove farming, mixed cropping, and floating gardens for flood resilience. Vietnamese women adapt with drought-resistant rice, irrigation adjustments, and modified planting times to address water scarcity.

 

Personal loan/Microcredit/Borrowing money: Climate change adaptation is costly, and women, with fewer resources than men, face financial barriers that limit effective adaptation. Women often rely on microcredit, loans, or intermediaries. In Bangladesh, women leverage NGO loans for family support, while female-headed Nigerian households access agricultural loans. In Vietnam, women secure low-interest loans or start small businesses to offset declining rice yields. In Gujarat, India, women transitioned from farming to lobster rearing, funded by loans after a climate event.

 

Saving money and Property selling: During crises, women’s property is often sold before men’s, and their limited capacity to save reduces their coping ability. In Bangladesh, women in char areas engage in diverse income-generating activities to build savings, which supports family adaptation during events like floods (Naz et al.). Similarly, rural Vietnamese women prioritize saving in advance to prepare for climate-related challenges.

 

Migration: In regions like Uttarakhand, Gujarat, and coastal Bangladesh, male outmigration grants women greater decision-making power over adaptation and income diversification despite lacking land ownership. However, they face challenges in accessing irrigation water, credit, labor, and handling increased workloads. In water-scarce Vietnam, women, especially those with lower education, turn to local or seasonal wage labor during dry periods. In drought-prone Nigeria, female-headed households often migrate or send children for off-farm work to reduce consumption pressures.

 

Education/Training: In Bangladesh, flood-affected rural women receive NGO training to diversify livelihoods, while urban women emphasize children’s education as a preventive measure. In drought-prone regions of India, organizations provide training to help women adapt to climate impacts. Education level significantly influences households’ adaptation capabilities by enhancing analytical skills for resilience strategies. Women in Mali prioritize education as a long-term strategy, aiming for their children to secure paid work and reduce dependence on natural resources.

 

Use of local indigenous knowledge: Women’s reliance on natural resources and ecological knowledge strengthens their role in climate adaptation. Their expertise enables them to gather and disseminate ecosystem information crucial for resilience. In the Fijian islands, intergenerational knowledge sharing from past disasters informs future adaptation strategies. In the Torres Strait Islands, women, known as "aunties," use local materials and predict weather patterns to enhance food security and self-sufficiency. Similarly, women in Bangladesh employ indigenous knowledge for climate hazard management, while women in Uttarakhand, India, utilize natural indicators to predict weather events, safeguarding family food security.

 

Petty trade, livestock rearing, home-made product selling: Women in regions like Uttarakhand, Gujarat, and Bangladesh adapt to climate stresses by engaging in handicrafts, trade, and livestock rearing for income and family nutrition. In food-scarce rural areas, women often reduce their own consumption to prioritize family needs. Here, staying hungry becomes a way of adapting to climate stresses. 

 

3.5 Sensitivity analysis - Not assessed

 

4. AMSTAR 2 assessment of the review

 

1 Did the the review state clearly the components of PICOS (or appropriate equivalent)?  Yes
2 Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol?  (i.e. was there a protocol) No
3 Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? Partial yes
4 Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate?  No
5 Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate?  No
6 Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions?  No
7 Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail?  (Yes if table of included studies, partially if other descriptive overview) No
8 Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review?  no
9 Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? No
10 If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results?  NA
11 Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review?  No
12 If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review?  NA
13 Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review?  No
Overall (lowest rating on any critical item) Low

 

5. Count of references to the following words  

 

Sex 0
Gender 49
Women/Woman 221
Intra-household 0

Included Studies