What specific climate-related challenges, such as extreme weather events, water scarcity, and food insecurity, disproportionately affect women living in rural areas in developing countries?
Short answer
Key finding
Climate change intersects with gender inequalities, making women in developing countries more vulnerable. Limited access to resources, decision-making power, and education further challenges their ability to cope with climate-related challenges.
Short summary
The reviews explore the intersection of climate change, gender, and food security in Africa and Asia. It highlights the disproportionate impact of climate-induced disasters on vulnerable women in the coastal, Haor, and Char regions of Bangladesh. Women, often marginalized and responsible for food gathering and fuel fetching, are particularly vulnerable to food insecurity and forced migration. The analysis reveals that women’s limited access to resources and decision-making power challenges their adaptability to climate change. The study highlights the need for gender-sensitive strategies to address climate-related challenges and ensure food security for vulnerable women.
Long answer
Long summary
What is this summary about?
This summary examines the challenges experienced by women in adapting to climate change. The impacts are multifaceted and far-reaching, extending beyond food security to encompass other aspects of their lives.
What evidence is this summary based on?
This summary is based on two systematic reviews:
Dev, D. S., & Manalo IV, J. A. (2023). Gender and adaptive capacity in climate change scholarship of developing countries: a systematic review of literature. Climate and Development, 15(10), 829-840.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2166781
Moon, M. P. (2024). How does climate change affect the food security and vulnerability of women? A systematic review of gender perspectives. Frontiers in Climate, 6, 1374469.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1374469/full
What are the main findings?
The review highlights the disproportionate impact of climate change on women, particularly in rural regions of Africa, South, and Southeast Asia. Societal norms, limited access to resources, and decision-making power worsen women’s vulnerability to climate-induced challenges.
Both Moon and Dev’s research highlights the significant impact of climate change on women's food security in developing countries. Moon, focusing on Bangladesh, emphasizes the devastating effects of extreme weather events like floods and cyclones on women’s agricultural livelihoods, exacerbated by existing gender inequalities such as limited access to resources and decision-making power. Dev, through a broader review across developing countries, identifies agriculture's vulnerability to climate change and the role of patriarchal structures in hindering women's adaptive capacity. Both authors stress the crucial need for gender-sensitive approaches to climate change adaptation, including addressing unequal access to resources and decision-making power, and considering the experiences of both women and men in developing effective and equitable solutions.
Thematic and conceptual analysis suggests that while the vulnerability and adaptive capacity of women are being discussed, the associated subjects of discussion—such as income, organization, community, water, food, farming, security, and land—vary in African and Asian countries. For instance, there is a tendency for studies conducted in Africa to focus on farming-related problems, while studies in Asia emphasized social problems faced by women
While research has primarily focused on household-level adaptation to climate change, there is a pressing need to delve deeper into individual-level vulnerabilities, particularly for women. Primary studies examine broader impacts on agriculture and food security, they often overlook the specific challenges faced by women in meeting their basic needs for health, nutrition, education, income, and resilience.
To develop effective adaptation strategies, it is crucial to understand the unique experiences of women in the context of climate change. One example of how patriarchal relations affect women's experiences due to climate change is their limited control over agricultural resources and outputs. In many developing countries, agriculture is a primary source of livelihood, and while women are often heavily involved in farming, they frequently lack control over key aspects of production and sales. This dynamic is described across multiple studies used by Dev and Manalo (2023). Additionally, women are primarily responsible for household chores, including securing food and water, tasks made more challenging by climate change. This includes increased travel for water, leading to health risks and reduced time for other activities. Climate change also increases women's unpaid care work and limits their economic opportunities due to health impacts and reduced access to resources. Existing inequalities, such as limited education and unequal power dynamics, exacerbate these burdens, particularly for women in rural areas of developing countries (Moon, 2024).
To better understand the opportunities to adequately support women’s adaptive capacities will require focusing on a collective approach of incorporating social, cultural, situational, locational and historical contexts of gendered climate vulnerabilities in society.
The evidence is based on two reviews with low confidence ratings, as assessed using the AMSTAR tool for systematic reviews
Review summaries
How does climate change affect the food security and vulnerability of women? A systematic review of gender perspectives
Review
Geography
Year
Citation
Number of included studies
Review type
Critical appraisal of included studies
Assessment review
1. Key finding
Overall
Climate change leads to increased food insecurity and exacerbates existing gender inequalities. This study highlights the need for gender-sensitive adaptation strategies to address food insecurity and empower women in the face of increasing climate risks.
Women and girls related
Climate change disproportionately impacts vulnerable groups in Bangladesh, particularly women.
2. Short summary
This systematic review examines how climate change impacts food security for vulnerable women in Bangladesh. The study focuses on three regions with distinct vulnerabilities: coastal, Haor, and Char. Coastal regions are susceptible to cyclones, storm surges, and sea-level rise, causing flooding and damage to agriculture. Haor regions face flash floods and riverbank erosion, while Char areas suffer from erosion, floods, and droughts. Women, often marginalized and lacking resources, are more susceptible to the impacts of these climate events. Climate change disrupts food production and distribution, leading to food insecurity. Women, primarily responsible for food gathering and fuel fetching, are particularly vulnerable. This vulnerability can lead to forced family migration, with women often bearing the brunt of relocation due to limited opportunities. The study underscores the need for more research on the impact of climate change on vulnerable groups, especially women. It calls for gender-sensitive adaptation strategies to ensure food security for these marginalized communities
3. Long summary
3.1 PICOS
Population:
Women in Bangladesh, specifically those who are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change on food security
Intervention:
Gendered impact of climate change (This is the phenomenon of interest. There is not a singular, particular intervention that is discussed by the author)
Outcome:
Effect of climate change on food security and vulnerability of women
Study design:
peer-reviewed research papers published in English between 2007-2023. Excluded from the study were vulnerable men.
3.2 Risk of bias- Not assessed
3.3 Publication bias- Not assessed
3.4 Findings
The author concludes that climate change poses a significant threat to food security in Bangladesh, particularly for vulnerable groups like women, due to the country’s low-lying geography and exposure to frequent floods, droughts, and cyclones that disrupt food production and distribution. These impacts are compounded for women, who often rely on climate-sensitive agriculture for both income and sustenance, while facing systemic barriers such as limited access to land, credit, and technology. Climate-related disruptions also strain their ability to access clean water, sanitation, and healthcare, while social norms place the burden of unpaid care work on them, restricting their time and participation in adaptation planning. Migration caused by climate-driven livelihood loss further increases women's risks by breaking social support networks. Despite these realities, the author notes a critical gap in research specific to women’s climate vulnerabilities in Bangladesh, as most studies overlook their unique experiences. To address this, the review recommends gender-sensitive strategies such as developing crop-specific adaptation plans, increasing empirical research on women's climate experiences, expanding emergency food storage, offering financial support for recovery and alternative livelihoods, and promoting gender equality by tackling harmful social norms. It also calls for integrating climate considerations into all policy levels, ensuring women’s inclusion in decision-making, boosting institutional capacity for gender-responsive adaptation, and raising awareness about the gendered impacts of climate change across communities and policymaking circles.
3.5 Sensitivity analysis- Not assessed
4. AMSTAR 2 assessment of the review
| 1. | Did the review state clearly the components of PICOS (or appropriate equivalent)? | Yes | |
| 2. | Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol? (i.e. was there a protocol) | No | |
| 3. | Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? | Yes | |
| 4. | Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? | No | |
| 5. | Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? | No | |
| 6. | Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? | No | |
| 7. | Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail? (Yes if table of included studies, partially if other descriptive overview) | No | |
| 8. | Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review? | No | |
| 9. | Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? | No | |
| 10. | If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? | N.a. | |
| 11. | Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? | N.a. | |
| 12. | If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? | N.a. | |
| 13. | Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review? | No | |
| Overall (lowest rating on any critical item) | Low |
5. Count of references to the following words
| Sex | 0 |
| Gender | 12 |
| Women | 13 |
| Intra-household | 1 |
Included Studies
Gender and adaptive capacity in climate change scholarship of developing countries: a systematic review of literature
Review
Geography
Year
Citation
Full text URL
Number of included studies
Review type
Critical appraisal of included studies
Assessment review
1. Key finding
Overall
Climate change disproportionately impacts women due to limited resources and decision-making power. There is an urgent need for equitable and context-specific adaptation strategies that address the diverse challenges faced by women in Africa and Asia
Women and girls related
Women are disproportionately affected by climate change, and patriarchal social structures restrict their access to the resources they need to adapt
2. Short summary
This review examines research on how gender impacts a country's ability to adapt to climate change. Analyzing 59 studies from 2010-2020, the authors found a strong focus on women's experiences. Women often face barriers to adaptation due to limited access to resources and decision-making power, often rooted in societal structures. Comparing research trends between Africa and Asia reveals differences. African studies frequently address agricultural challenges, while Asian studies tend to focus on social issues. This suggests that the specific impacts and adaptation strategies for women may vary across regions.
3. Long summary
3.1 PICOS
Population:
Women from African and Asian countries.
Intervention:
Interventions related to climate change adaptation, particularly concerning gender and adaptive capacity in developing countries.
Outcome:
To enhance adaptive capacity, reduce vulnerability, and promote more equitable and sustainable approaches to climate change adaptation in developing countries.
Study design:
Peer-reviewed and grey full-text manuscripts published in English between 2010-2020. Excluded publications belonging to medicine, econometrics and engineering.
3.2 Risk of bias- Not assessed
3.3 Publication bias- Not assessed
3.4 Findings
A review of 59 articles published between 2010 and 2020 reveals that climate change research frequently centers on the keyword “women,” highlighting their disproportionate vulnerability due to socio-economic struggles and gendered social structures. Key areas of concern include household responsibilities, healthcare, inequality, and violence, with agriculture emerging as a primary lens through which gender and adaptive capacity are examined. Concepts like power, social norms, asset control, and decision-making repeatedly surface as critical, though not always central, influences on women’s capacity to adapt. These power imbalances, entrenched in household, community, and institutional structures—particularly in patriarchal systems—restrict women’s access to resources and decision-making. Thematic analysis shows regional variations, with African studies focusing more on farming and Asian studies on social challenges. Despite growing discourse around women’s vulnerability and adaptation, many studies still prioritize household-level capacity over individual needs like health, income, and education. To meaningfully support women’s adaptive capacities, adaptation strategies must adopt a collective, context-specific approach that integrates the social, cultural, historical, and geographic dimensions shaping gendered climate vulnerability.
3.5 Sensitivity analysis- Not assessed
4. AMSTAR 2 assessment of the review
| 1. | Did the review state clearly the components of PICOS (or appropriate equivalent)? | Yes | |
| 2. | Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol? (i.e. was there a protocol) | No | |
| 3. | Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? | Yes | |
| 4. | Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? | Yes | |
| 5. | Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? | No | |
| 6. | Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? | No | |
| 7. | Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail? (Yes if table of included studies, partially if other descriptive overview) | No | |
| 8. | Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review? | No | |
| 9. | Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? | No | |
| 10. | If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? | N.a. | |
| 11. | Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? | N.a. | |
| 12. | If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? | N.a. | |
| 13. | Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review? | No | |
| Overall (lowest rating on any critical item) | Low |
5. Count of references to the following words
| Sex | 1 |
| Gender | 33 |
| Women | 12 |
| Intra-household | 0 |